USPTO serial 75806674
ASHFORD.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASHFORD.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS H ADOLPH
THOMAS H ADOLPH BAKER BOTTSSHELL910 LOUISIANA ST STE 3000HOUSTON, TX 77002-4995Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Retail sales provided over the Internet featuring luxury goods, namely watches, watch winders, watch bands, clocks, diamonds, jewelry, hair ornaments, belts, writing accessories, leather goods, sunglasses, handbags, ties, cummerbunds, cufflinks, scarves, fragrances, bath and body products, candles, cufflinks, pocket knives, crystal items, china, bare ware, bar accessories, dishes, food service pieces, candle holders, artwork, picture frames, picture albums, silver and pewter pieces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |