USPTO serial 75806689
EDISPATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 23, 2002
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EDISPATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
eDispatch.com Wireless Data Inc.
Burnaby, British Columbia V5G 4G3, CA
eDispatch.com Wireless Data Inc.
Burnaby, British Columbia V5G 4G3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
DOUGLAS T JOHNSON MILLER & MARTINVOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVE STE 1000CHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, providing a wireless dispatch service for others over global computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |