USPTO serial 75806894
Serial No. 75806894
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75806894?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
Rockville, MD
Norwalk, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. J. Heher
R J HEHER FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | synthetic materials for scientific or medical research use, namely, synthetic DNA; biological materials for scientific or medical research use, namely, cells and natural DNA; reagents for scientific or medical research use | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Perkin-Elmer Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by Applera Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Perkin-Elmer Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by PE Corporation (NY)
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |