USPTO serial 75806942
NEW YORK 9
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEW YORK 9?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN A RHEINTGEN
KATHLEEN A RHEINTGEN WELSH & KATZ LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | conducting public opinion poll surveys to designate the best baseball starting line up from a pool of all players to ever play the game; and promoting the sport of baseball by conducting a public campaign to designate the best baseball starting line-up from a pool of all players to ever play the game | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |