USPTO serial 75807265
MEDOLIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDOLIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
81090 Erenkoy, Istanbul, TR
81090 Erenkoy, Istanbul, TR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE L ADAMS
BRUCE L ADAMS ADAMS & WILKS50 BROADWAY31ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | olive oil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |