Drawing for HYDRO-BIKES

USPTO serial 75807385

HYDRO-BIKES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDRO-BIKES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard John Bartz

RICHARD JOHN BARTZ BARTZ & BARTZ6750 FRANCE AVE S STE 350EDINA, MN 55435UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012human powered watercraft, namely, boats; electric motor powered boats; and sailboatsACTIVEApr 26, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 22, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 22, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 12, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 22, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance