USPTO serial 75807559
MULTIPLEX POLYMER MATRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 31, 2002
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MULTIPLEX POLYMER MATRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-63450 HANAU, DE
63450 Hanau, DE
63450 Hanau, DE
63450 Hanau, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathaniel D. Kramer
Nathaniel D. Kramer Kirschstein Ottinger Israel & Schiffmiller425 Fifth Avenue5th FloorNew York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS FOR DENTAL AND DENTAL TECHNICAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, LIQUID, PASTE OR POWDERED SINGLE AND MULTIPLE COMPONENT SYNTHETIC MATERIALS FOR DENTAL AND DENTAL TECHNICAL PURPOSES IN THE RAW STATE OR AS SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCTS; DENTAL PLASTICS AND PLASTICS CONTAINING MATERIALS IN LIQUID, PASTE OR POWDERED FORM FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL TEETH AND DENTAL PROSTHESIS AND PARTS THEREOF; DENTAL PLASTICS AND PLASTIC CONTAINING MATERIALS FOR USE AS TOOTH FILLING MATERIALS, LINING MATERIALS AND AS ADHESION PROMOTERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HERAEUS KULZER GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Heraeus Kulzer GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Heraeus Kulzer GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Heraeus Kulzer GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MULTIPLEX POLYMER MATRIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |