USPTO serial 75807762
INTERNET UNLIMITED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERNET UNLIMITED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Camille M Miller
JOYCE W JENZANO MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC2200 W MAIN ST STE 800DURHAM, NC 27705UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | maintaining web sites for others; registration of domain names for the identification of users on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |