Drawing for EGILE

USPTO serial 75807773

EGILE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EGILE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M Abel

SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQSTE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business consultation regarding business opportunities and strategies in electronic commerce; business consultation services, namely, advising enterprises regarding the development of business models for use in an electronic environmentACTIVE—
037installation of computer systems, including the implementation and configuration of computer systems regarding reengineering and transformation of computer systemsACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, conducting training classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the field of business opportunities and strategies in electronic commerce and conducting training classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in advising enterprises regarding the development of business models for use in an electronic environment; computer education training, namely the transformation, adaptation and use of existing software application programs for use on web sites and in electronic commerce and use of computer software, and use, configuration and implementation of local area and other computer communications networksACTIVE—
042installation, implementation, and configuration of computer software; computer consultation services, namely, consulting regarding the transformation, adaptation and use of existing software application programs for use on web sites and in electronic commerce; computer web design services, namely creating and maintaining web sites for others; computer consultation services, namely, consulting regarding use of computer software, consulting regarding use, configuration and implementation of local area and other computer and communications networks; software compatibility testing services; software development services, namely the design and maintenance of computer software for others including computer software development process review services, software development design services and software development implementation services and computer programming servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 30, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance