Drawing for BLUE MOUNTAIN ARTS

USPTO serial 75807844

BLUE MOUNTAIN ARTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BLUE MOUNTAIN ARTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robin Lightner Maisashvili

ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI BAKER & BOTTS LLPONE SHELL PLZ910 LOUISIANAHOUSTON, TX 77002-4995

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services; consulting, design, testing, research, analysis, timesharing, technical support and other technical and advisory services, all relating to computing and computer programming; web site design, creation and hosting services; web site portal services; database leasing; providing access to data via the Internet; providing access via computer and communication networks, including the Internet, to text, electronic documents, databases, graphics and audio visual information; providing access to, leasing access time to, and providing search, retrieval, indexing, linking and data organization capabilities for the Internet, electronic communications networks and electronic databases; transferring and disseminating information and data via computer networks and the Internet; compiling, storing, analyzing and retrieving data and information; maintaining, indexing and electronically distributing advertising materials; Internet service provider services; providing virtual facilities for real-time interaction among computer users; printing services; information, consultancy and advisory services, all relating to the aforesaid, including such services provided online from a computer network or via the Internet or extranets,ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance