USPTO serial 75807853
DIGITAL CONCIERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL CONCIERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig J. Yudell
CRAIG J YUDELL DILLON & YUDELL LLP8911 N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY STE 2110AUSTIN, TX 78759UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising the goods and services of others via global computer networks and/or internal networks, and providing equipment and software to allow such advertising via global computer networks and/or internal networks; providing information, discounts and promotions for restaurants, movies, entertainment, shopping, sports events,consumer services, and travel, and providing equipment and software to provide such information, discounts, and promotions via global computer networks and/or internal networks; providing telecommunications services, namely, data transmission services, voice transmission services, video transmission services, and audio transmission services, in buildings having single or multiple users; providing telecommunications connections to global computer networks and internal networks; providing online, via global computer networks and/or internal networks, information about restaurants, movies, entertainment, shopping, sports events, consumer services, travel, and user profiles, and providing equipment and software to provide such information via global computer networks and/or internal networks; providing online connectivity, via global computer networks and/or internal networks, to allow users to transmit and receive information to and from restaurants, movie theaters, entertainment providers, stores, sports event providers, providers of consumer services, travel services and user profile databases; providing training for users and employees of telecommunication connection services; web site design and hosting services; providing printers and printing services; providing telecommunication connection marketing services, and training related to telecommunication connection marketing; and wireless telecommunication connection services, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |