USPTO serial 75807883
ECASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY A. TRIBER
OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLYPO BOX 52307PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | personal digital assistant computer (PDA) and other electronic communications devices, namely computer cable, cards, and wireless communication transmission devices, and computer software for use therewith, namely, for storage, retrieval, viewing, management, editing, and transmission of database, spreadsheet, word processing, and electronic mail documents | ACTIVE | Jan 14, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |