Drawing for IBELIEVE

USPTO serial 75807894

IBELIEVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IBELIEVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Norman

JEFFREY S NORMAN KIRKLAND & ELLIS200 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK FEATURING CHRISTIAN MARKET RELATED BOOKS, BIBLES, GIFTS, CARDS, APPAREL, SUPPLIES, VIDEOS AND SOFTWAREACTIVE—
038PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING CHRISTIAN RELATED TOPICS AND DISCUSSIONSACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TO THE CHRISTIAN MARKET PROVIDING REAL-TIME INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF DAILY DEVOTIONALS, INSPIRING ARTICLES AND MUSICACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 13, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 13, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 24, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Jun 24, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance