USPTO serial 75808066
TERASPERSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2824245Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TERASPERSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. WOODBRIDGE
RICHARD C. WOODBRIDGE FOX ROTHSCHILD LLPP.O. Box 5231PRINCETON, NJ 08543-5231UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Specialty chemicals, namely [proprietary, functional additives for general industrial use in the manufacture of a wide variety of goods] * chemical additives for general industrial use in the manufacture of a wide variety of goods, wherein the specialty chemicals and chemical additives are not surface active compounds used in the industrial arts as wetting, spreading, emulsifying, dispersing and penetrating agents * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |