USPTO serial 75808530
954 REVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 954 REVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL P BROOK
PETER R MARTINEZ LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS, LLPSTE 20011988 EL CAMINO REALSAN DIEGO, CA 92130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | snowmobiles and parts therefor; fitted protective covers for snowmobiles; and engines for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |