USPTO serial 75808737
OHAENG SAENGSHIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OHAENG SAENGSHIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Choongcheongnam-Do, KR
Choongcheongnam-Do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne H. Peck
ANNE H PECK COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business consulting services to the food industry; namely, business management, business planning and business consultation services, locating and recruiting independent sales representatives, conducting business research; conducting market research, product merchandising strategies, and management recommendations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |