USPTO serial 75808915
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD L. JACKSON
HAROLD L JACKSON JACKSON LAW CORPORATION14751 PLZ DR STE NTUSTIN, CA 92780UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded videotapes pertaining to techniques, concepts, principles, tools and examples for teaching and motivating the viewer to improve his or her personal and professional life | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 1999 |
| 016 | books in the field of personal and professional self improvement | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting training programs and classes, seminars and workshops in the field of personal and professional development for individuals and including enhancing one's organizational skills and cooperation with others in an organization and distributing course materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |