USPTO serial 75808967
MOLISABA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COREA, ANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOLISABA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nuevo Leon, C.P. 66210, MX
Nuevo Leon, C.P. 66210, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANITA E. KADALA
ANITA E KADALA WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP700 LOUISIANA STE 1600HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes; flours and cereal based preparations, namely, pasta and noodles, bread, biscuits, cakes, pastry and candy, ice-cream; honey, molasses; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces, except salad dressings, spices, and ice | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |