USPTO serial 75809355
LIFT-TEK MASTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2601772Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- ALVES, RICHARD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFT-TEK MASTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WESTMINSTER, SC
Guelph, Ontario, N1H 8J1, CA
Guelph, Ontario, N1H 8J1, CA
Guelph, Ontario, N1H 8J1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rochelle Claerbaut
Rochelle Claerbaut BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP. O. Box 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | fork lift truck parts, namely lifting masts and replacement parts therefor | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LIFT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named LIFT-TEK MASTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |