USPTO serial 75809537
TODAY'S ROAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2002
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TODAY'S ROAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Manny D. Pokotilow
MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN ET7 PENN CTR 12TH FL1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2217Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE BEANS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |