USPTO serial 75809667
MICROFUEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROFUEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES C WRAY
JAMES C WRAY MANHATTAN SCIENTIFIC INC1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fuel cells and fuel cell tanks for producing electrical energy; chemical fuel for fuel cells provided as a unit with the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |