Drawing for POWER HOLSTER

USPTO serial 75809670

POWER HOLSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER HOLSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray,

JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Fuel cell based charging systems for charging and holding electronic devices using the fuel cells, comprising a frame, a hook for mounting the frame, a fuel cell receiver in the frame, an indicator connected to the receiver for indicating fuel cell level, circuitry and connectors connected to the fuel cell receiver for connecting a fuel cell in the receiver to a charging connection on an electronic device and a device holder formed on the frame for holding the electronic device with its charging contacts connected to the connectorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 13, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 13, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 7, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 15, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 7, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 25, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance