Drawing for TRANSCEIVER PIPELINE

USPTO serial 75809764

TRANSCEIVER PIPELINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSCEIVER PIPELINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DONALD L. DENNISON

DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON SCHULTZ & DOUGHERTY612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPONENTS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR USE IN NETWORK MODELING AND SIMULATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 20, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 27, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 1, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 1, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 25, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance