USPTO serial 75809781
OXYTUNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2566451Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 2002
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OXYTUNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STRADA, RODANO, MILANO, IT
Milan, IT
Milan, IT
Milan, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine M. Clayton
Catherine M. Clayton Gibbons P.C.One Pennsylvania Plaza, 37th FloorNew York, NY 10119-3701UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THERMO ELECTRON S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by THERMOQUEST ITALIA S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by THERMOQUEST ITALIA S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by THERMO FINNIGAN ITALIA S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named OXYTUNE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 7, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |