USPTO serial 75809786
PRIMUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2007
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRIMUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Grand Duchy, LU
Grand Duchy, LU
Grand Duchy, LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
George A. Pelletier, Jr. Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cranes and special purpose traveling cranes for steelworks; hydraulic valves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Control circuits for hydraulic valves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electric steel plants for industrial users in the steel industry; multiple hearth furnaces; electric furnaces, namely electric arc furnaces; cooling systems for multiple hearth furnaces; heat recovery apparatus for use by industrial users in the iron and steel industries; and, incinerators and dust-extractors for the treatment of exhaust gas for use in the iron and steel industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of industrial waste, such as sludge and dust, which contain metal in any form, including metal oxides, metal hydroxides and metal salts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultation services in the field of engineering in connection with plant, equipment and processes for the iron and steel industry, up and running units in the industrial and civil engineering fields, constructional steel work, boiler work and mechanical engineering; intellectual property consultation; construction consultation, namely construction drafting in the field of steel making plants; design studies relating to iron and steel processing; mechanical engineering research; technical research relating to iron and steel processing; engineering services in the fields of mechanical engineering, civil engineering fluids, electricity, automation and preparation of technical reports; design, development and maintenance of computer software for others; computer software programming for others; preparation of technical reports relating to iron and steel processing for others; metal and material testing services; preparation of design studies for the construction of buildings; and consulting services in the field engineering, particularly in the field of hydraulic systems and equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PAUL WURTH S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PAUL WURTH S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PAUL WURTH S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRIMUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 5, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |