Drawing for ARTISTDOMINION

USPTO serial 75809805

ARTISTDOMINION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTISTDOMINION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meyer A. Gross

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS MERCHANDISING DISPLAY SERVICES; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION; CAREER PLACEMENT, JOB PLACEMENT, PERSONNEL PLACEMENT AND RECRUITMENT; MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYMENT TALENT AGENCIES; BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES; COMMERCIAL INFORMATION AGENCIES ON HOW TO START AND MAINTAIN A BUSINESS; COOPERATIVE ADVERTISING AND MARKETING; CONDUCTING MARKETING STUDIES; AND PREPARING MAILING LISTSACTIVE—
038PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING EMPLOYMENT; PROVIDING ON-LINE ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING EMPLOYMENTACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 8, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Oct 23, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance