Drawing for EYE MIRROR

USPTO serial 75809949

EYE MIRROR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EYE MIRROR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC DRILLING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES WHICH ARE ALSO KNOWN AS DED'S; ELECTRIC CUTTING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES; ELECTRIC FORMING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES; ELECTRIC SINTERING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES; ELECTRIC SURFACE TREATING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES; ELECTRIC ANNEALING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR; ELECTRIC MARKING MACHINES AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES; POWER GENERATORS COMPRISED OF ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC AND/OR OPTICAL COMPONENTSACTIVE—
009DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES WHICH ARE ALSO KNOWN AS DED'S FOR NON-MEDICAL USES, WHICH MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF LASERS FOR NON-MEDICAL USES; ELECTRICALLY POWERED WELDERS; OPTICAL COMPUTERS; COMPONENTS OF OPTICAL COMPUTERS, NAMELY, LOGIC GATES AND OPTICAL CONNECTIONS; BEAM EXPANDERS FOR LASERS; GUIDANCE SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC AND OPTICAL COMPONENTS, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES; COMPONENTS OF GUIDANCE SYSTEMS, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES; SAFETY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, DIRECTIONAL BEACON LIGHTS; TRANSMITTERS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY; ELECTRIC DISPLAY PANELS; GUN SIGHTS FOR FIREARMS; TELESCOPIC GUN SIGHTS FOR FIREARMS; EMERGENCY DIRECTIONAL WARNING LIGHTS FOR OBJECTS AND DANGERS, NOT FOR VEHICLES; OPTICAL MIRRORS NOT FOR PERSONAL USE; RADAR; OPTICAL SCANNERS; ELECTRIC LIGHT PROJECTORS; OPTICAL TRANSMITTERS; LIGHT EMITTING DIODES; LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAYS; AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR EACH OF THE FOREGOINGACTIVE—
010ILLUMINATORS FOR MEDICAL APPARATUS; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES WHICH ARE ALSO KNOWN AS DED'S FOR MEDICAL USES, WHICH MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF LASERS FOR MEDICAL USES; SURGICAL LAMPS; SURGICAL CUTTERS; LAMPS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENTS PARTS FOR EACH OF THE FOREGOINGACTIVE—
011ILLUMINATORS FOR ACTIVE SENSORS; ELECTRIC LIGHTS; LAMPS; LIGHTS FOR VEHICLES; FLOODLIGHTS; FLASHLIGHTS; SEARCH LIGHTS; HEAT PUMPS; AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR EACH OF THE FOREGOINGACTIVE—
012VEHICLES WITH PROPULSION BY A DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICE WHICH IS ALSO KNOWN AS A DED, INCLUDING SPACECRAFT, MISSILES, PROJECTILES, AND AIRCRAFT, WHEREIN THE ENERGY BEAM FROM THE DED ALLOWS THE DIRECTION AND MOVEMENT OF THE VEHICLES TO BE CONTROLLED; AND A DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICE FOR INERTIAL FUSION WHICH GENERATES ENERGY TOGETHER WITH A BEAM AND/OR AN IMPULSE TO ALLOW THE DIRECTION AND MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES INCLUDING SPACECRAFT, MISSILES, PROJECTILES, AND AIRCRAFT, TO BE CONTROLLEDACTIVE—
013WEAPONRY, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS, COUNTERMEASURES, INERTIAL FUSION WEAPONS, LASER WEAPONS, GUIDED MISSILES, GUIDED PROJECTILES, AND GUIDED BOMBS; OPTICAL AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS FOR USE IN BOMBS, NAMELY, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES WHICH ARE ALSO KNOWN AS DED'S; AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR EACH OF THE FOREGOINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 11, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance