USPTO serial 75809961
DCC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DCC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Louis Metro Round Table Representatives on Deafness, Inc.
St. Louis, MO
Other trademarks owned by St. Louis Metro Round Table Representatives on Deafness, Inc.
St. Louis Metro Round Table Representatives on Deafness, Inc.
St. Louis, MO
Other trademarks owned by St. Louis Metro Round Table Representatives on Deafness, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew B. Mayfield
ANDREW B MAYFIELD ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLPONE METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2740UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING COMMUNITY PROGRAMS THROUGH CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF DEAF-RELATED ISSUES AND TOPICS RELATED THERETO | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMMUNITY CENTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION AND COUNSELING ON ISSUES OF RELEVANCE TO THE DEAF COMMUNITY, NAMELY, LIVING WITH DEAFNESS TO ENABLE THEM TO BETTER MANAGE THEIR HANDICAP; PROVIDING COUNSELING AND INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF SIGN LANGUAGE, HEALTH AND NUTRITION; LEGAL SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by St. Louis Metro Round Table Representatives on Deafness, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by St. Louis Metro Round Table Representatives on Deafness, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DCC
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |