Drawing for VITALIFE AROUSAL FOR MEN

USPTO serial 75810188

VITALIFE AROUSAL FOR MEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VITALIFE AROUSAL FOR MEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin Anderson

Kevin Anderson Law Office of Kevin Anderson1427 25th StreetSanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary food and nutritional supplements for humans, namely, vitamin and mineral and herbal supplements and mixturesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 6, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 6, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 6, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 5, 2009OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2009UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 28, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 22, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 22, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 24, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 19, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 1, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 2, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance