USPTO serial 75811298
NEARFIELD ACOUSTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2003
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEARFIELD ACOUSTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nashville, TN
NASHVILLE, TN
Nashville, TN
Nashville, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy Robertson
Wendy Robertson Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC6060 POPLAR AVENUE, SUITE 440MEMPHIS, TN 38119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ACOUSTICAL SYSTEMS, NAMELY LOUDSPEAKERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Near Field Acoustics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IROQUOIS HOLDING COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Near Field Acoustics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Near Field Acoustics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NEARFIELD ACOUSTICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |