USPTO serial 75811313
TEATECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 2005
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TEATECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Draper, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danyi Quan
Danyi Quan XEL HERBACEUTICALS, INC.12382 Gateway Park Place, Ste B600Draper, UT 84020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICALS, NAMELY, [ ANTIHYPERTENSION AGENTS, DIURETICS, ANOREXIGENICS, FUNGISTATIC AND FUNGICIDAL AGENTS, ANALGESICS, HORMONAL AGENTS, ANTITUSSIVE AGENTS, SEDATIVES, CARDIAC AGENTS, ANTIMICROBIAL AND ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS, ANTICANCER AGENTS, ] HERBAL DIETARY NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS AND VITAMINS, AND MEDICINE FILLED PATCHES FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF SKIN DISORDERS AND DISEASES, NAMELY, ACNE, AGED SKIN, AGE SPOTS [ ; MEDICINE FILLED PATCHES FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY, CANCER, HEART DISEASE AND FUNGI INFECTIONS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 18, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by XEL HERBACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TeaTech, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TeaTech, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by XEL HERBACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named TEATECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 27, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |