USPTO serial 75811354
HOSPIMEDICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3190364Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2007
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOSPIMEDICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
40474 Dusseldorf, DE
40474 Dusseldorf, DE
40474 Dusseldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN MYERS
JONATHAN MYERS THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE, NY 10471-0900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | BROADCASTING OF RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS, SOUND AND PICTURE TRANSMISSION VIA SATELLITE, ALL DEALING WITH ARRANGING FAIRS IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | NEWS AGENCIES, NAMELY, GATHERING AND DISSEMINATION OF NEWS REGARDING TRADE FAIRS AND EXHIBITIONS IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; ALL AFOREMENTIONED SERVICES ALSO PROVIDED ON-LINE; PROVIDING AND ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE THAT INCLUDES ONLY INFORMATION ON TRADE FAIRS AND EXHIBITIONS IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MESSE DUSSELDORF GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MESSE DUSSELDORF GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MESSE DUSSELDORF GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HOSPIMEDICA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |