Drawing for MR. COFFEE

USPTO serial 75811409

MR. COFFEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MR. COFFEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE J SHURUPOFF

LAWRENCE J SHURUPOFF KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP2381 EXECUTIVE CTR DRBOCA RATON, FL 33431UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029fruits, jams, jellies, package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit, sauces, non-dairy creamer, and fruit, nut and whipped toppingsACTIVE—
030bakery goods; candy; food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient, or filler; food and beverage flavorings; chocolate; chocolate syrups; chocolate flavorings for hot and cold food and beverages; cookies; sugar; natural sweeteners; sugar substitutes; ice cream; shakes; granola based snack bars; rice and/or wheat based snack foods; tea; and spicesACTIVE—
031fresh fruitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 3, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 26, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 29, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance