Drawing for KIDSEDGE

USPTO serial 75811888

KIDSEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIDSEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bernard R. Gans

ANNA SILVA LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES INC6401 HOLLIS ST STE 150EMERYVILLE, CA 94608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded compact discs, laser discs, CD ROMs, DVDs, DVD ROMs, video tapes, cassettes and other pre-recorded optical, electronic and magnetic media directed to child development and education, parenting, grandparenting, raising a family and health and nutritionACTIVE—
016Publications, namely, series of books, magazines, newsletters, pamphlets,.brochures and journals in the fields of child development and education, parenting, grandparenting, raising a family, and health and nutritionACTIVE—
038Electronic mail, broadcasting programs via the internet and providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users, both services in the field of child development and education, parenting, grandparenting, raising a family and health and nutritionACTIVE—
041Web sites providing information in the field of education, namely, the field of study that is concerned with the pedagogy of teaching and learning; entertainment services, namely, providing web cast television programs in the fields of child development and education, parenting, grand parenting, raising a family, an health and nutritionACTIVE—
042Web sites providing information in the fields of child development, parenting, grandparenting, raising a family, and health and nutritionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 7, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 19, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance