USPTO serial 75811992
URVASHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with URVASHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shrirang Society, Thane (W) 400 601, IN
Shrirang Society, Thane (W) 400 601, IN
Shrirang Society, Thane (W) 400 601, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN C/O ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMERY PRODUCTS, NAMELY PERFUME OILS, PERFUME, EAU DE TOILETTE, AND COLOGNE; ESSENTIAL OILS, NAMELY ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE AND ESSENTIAL OILS FOR USE IN MANUFACTURING OF COSMETICS; COSMETICS, NAMELY COSMETIC PREPARATIONS FOR THE BATH, NAMELY BATH BEADS, CRYSTALS, FOAM, GEL, OIL, PEARLS AND POWDER; SUN-TANNING PREPARATIONS; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS FOR EYE LASHES, NAMELY EYE CREAM, EYE GELS, MAKEUP AND MAKEUP REMOVER, MASCARA; COSMETIC CREAMS, NAMELY ANTI-AGING AND ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM, BODY CREAM, BODY MASK CREAM, COLD CREAM, CREAMS FOR CELLULITE REDUCTION, FACIAL CREAMS, MAKE UP REMOVING PREPARATIONS, MAKE UP, CLEANSING MILK FOR TOILET PURPOSES, LIPSTICKS, AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS, AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS, AFTER SUN LOTIONS, SKIN LOTIONS; TOILET BODY AND FACIAL SOAPS, HAIR LOTIONS AND HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |