USPTO serial 75812047
WINTER FACTORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINTER FACTORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Natural Factors Nutritional Products Ltd.
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Natural Factors Nutritional Products Ltd.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal extracts for use as dietary supplements; nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |