Drawing for Serial No. 75812171

USPTO serial 75812171

Serial No. 75812171

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75812171?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mikolean M. Longacre

MIKOLEAN M LONGACRE LONGACRE & ASSOCIATES1919 S EADS STSTE 401ARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Welding wire made of metalACTIVE—
007electrical and gas-operated welding machines and structural parts therefor, namely, gas nozzles, contact tips connections for welding torches, namely, electrical connectors, cable assemblies for welding and cutting torches; pumps for liquids, oil pumps for use in motors and engines and positive displacement pumps, welding equipment for robots, namely, electrical welding machinesACTIVE—
009welding electrodes, data processors and computers; commuter software for use in database management, for measuring welding equipmentACTIVE—
035business management consultation; telephone answering services; preparing and placing advertisement for othersACTIVE—
038providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing telecommunication access to the Internet; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephoneACTIVE—
042Providing computer programming services to businessesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 18, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance