USPTO serial 75812217
THE PRIVATE LIFE OF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 17, 2004
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE PRIVATE LIFE OF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES P. LAPOLIA
CHARLES P. LAPOLIA OSTEROLENK FABER LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded video tapes, discs, and DVDs containing motion pictures, photographic and graphic works featuring adult entertainment; photographic slides featuring adult entertainment; and motion picture films featuring adult entertainment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | [ Magazines in the field of adult entertainment, photographs and drawings of an erotic content ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CINE CRAFT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FRASERSIDE IP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CINE CRAFT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CINE CRAFT LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named THE PRIVATE LIFE OF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 25, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 22, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 2, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |