USPTO serial 75812262
SURF POWER FRESH SPRING BURST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SURF POWER FRESH SPRING BURST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth C. Leonard
KENNETH C LEONARD LEVER HOUSE390 PARK AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Laundry detergent | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEVER INVESTMENTS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CHESEBROUGH PONDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CHESEBROUGH PONDS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SURF POWER FRESH SPRING BURST
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |