USPTO serial 75812622
MICROBIOLOGY GOES MOLECULAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROBIOLOGY GOES MOLECULAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Foster City, CA
FOSTER CITY, CA
Foster City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRY G. THIBAULT
JORGE C BARRENO APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS850 LINCOLN CTR DRFOSTER CITY, CA 94404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Reagents and kits consisting primarily of reagents used to identify, detect, and characterize bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites, and other organisms in the field of life science, scientific research, genetic analysis and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PE Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by APPLERA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PE Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named MICROBIOLOGY GOES MOLECULAR
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 8, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |