USPTO serial 75812646
ALPHABETSVILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALPHABETSVILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL D LEVITON
STEPHEN R BAIRD WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, PASTE 3500225 SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boblinste-Davjan, L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Boblinste-Davjan, L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ALPHABETSVILLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |