USPTO serial 75812651
Serial No. 75812651
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2908895Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2004
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75812651?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SALT LAKE, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
SALT LAKE, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER M. DE JONGE
PETER M DE JONGETHORPE N & WESTERN, LLPP O BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care preparations, namely, anit-wrinkle, moisturizing, skin lightener and skin-firming creams, lotions, toners, [ cleansers, moisturizers, ] gels [ , emulsions, serums, soft capsules, facial mask packs, cleaners, eye treatments, and face and body powder; non-medicated cosmetic topical preparations, namely, creams, lotions, ointments and gels for use in treating dermatological conditions; cosmetics, namely, foundation, blushers, blemish touch-up sticks, mascara, eyeshadow, eyeliner, eye makeup, lipstick, lip pencil, nail enamel, nail care treatments, sun block, after-sun balm, deodorant, anti-perspirant, perfume and cologne; hair care preparations, namely hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair cream rinse, hair spray, hair mousse, hair treatments, hair gel, hair moisturizer ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |