Drawing for THE SELLSTROM ADVANTAGE

USPTO serial 75812712

THE SELLSTROM ADVANTAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SELLSTROM ADVANTAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah Schavey Ruff

DEBORAH SCHAVEY RUFF MAYER, BROWN & PLATTP O BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009WELDING HELMETS, SAFETY GLASSES, INDUSTRIAL RESPIRATORY PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PERSONAL RESPIRATORS, FALL PROTECTION SAFETY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LIFELINES; SHOCK ABSORBING LANYARDS; BODY BELTS; SAFETY HARNESS; SHOCK ABSORBERS FOR SAFETY LIFELINES; STRESS INDICATORS FOR FALL ARREST DEVICES; LANYARD HOLDERS FOR SAFETY HARNESSES; ANCHOR LINES FOR LIFELINES; BYPASS DEVICE FOR LIFELINES; METAL RAILINGS; ROPE TENSIONERS TO FASTEN, ADJUST AND TIGHTEN HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LIFELINES; CONFINED SPACE, PERSONAL ACCESS, RETRIEVAL AND MATERIAL HANDLING WINCHES; LOW FRICTION TROLLEY CARS; CLIMBING AND LIFTING UNITS AND FALL PREVENTION AND ESCAPE APPARATUS; AND 3-DIMENSIONAL FALL ARREST SYSTEM HAVING A MOBILE ANCHOR AND SELF-RETRACTING LIFELINE, WELDING HELMETS AND OPTICAL FILTERS FOR WELDING HELMETS, PROTECTIVE EYE AND FACE FILTER FOR CUTTING AND WELDING HEADGEAR, SAFETY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY HAND HELD WELDING SHIELDS, AND PROTECTIVE EYEWEAR, NAMELY SAFETY GLASSES AND SAFETY GOGGLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 12, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Apr 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance