USPTO serial 75812742
AMERICANADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMERICANADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOLLY B. SAFRONOFF
HOLLY B SAFRONOFF EVANS & LUPTAK, PLC7457 FRANKLIN RD STE 250BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Leasing commercial office space and real property and providing office building management services | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |