USPTO serial 75813035
PROTECO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROTECO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
67227 Frankenthal, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur Schwartz
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 500 3000 K ST N WP O BOX 25696WASHINGTON, DC 20007-8696Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | paints, varnishes, lacquers; preservatives against rust and against deterioration of wood; colourants, mordants, raw natural resins, metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and arts | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | building materials (non-metallic); non-metallic rigid pipes for building; asphalt, pitch and bitumen, non- metallic transportable buildings; monuments not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum and other materials for covering existing floors, wall-hangings (non-textile) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |