USPTO serial 75813210
CERTIGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CERTIGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Theale, Berkshire, RG7 4SA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A.Cigelnik
PATRICIA A CIGELNIK DVORAK & ORUM53 W JACKSON BLVDCHICAGO, IL 60604-3606UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |