Drawing for OSTEOBLAST

USPTO serial 75813571

OSTEOBLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OSTEOBLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplement, namely a beverage with high calcium contentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 13, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 10, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jun 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 28, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 21, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance