USPTO serial 75813931
MERGERENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MERGERENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GAILYC C. SONIA
GAILYC C SONIA HUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR101 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING ON-LINE BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF MERGER AND ACQUISITION ADVISORY SERVICES THROUGH WHICH POTENTIAL BUYERS AND SELLERS OF BUSINESSES MAY CONNECT EITHER BY CHOICE OR AUTOMATICALLY BY SELECTION OF SPECIFIC CUSTOMER PARAMETERS RELATING TO BUSINESS SIZE, TYPE, AND COST | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | PROVIDING ON-LINE FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF MERGER AND ACQUISITION ADVISORY SERVICES THROUGH WHICH POTENTIAL BUYERS AND SELLERS OF BUSINESSES MAY CONNECT EITHER BY CHOICE OR AUTOMATICALLY BY SELECTION OF SPECIFIC CUSTOMER PARAMETERS RELATING TO BUSINESS SIZE, TYPE, AND COST | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ross, Crossland Weston & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Ross, Crossland Weston & Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MERGERENGINE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |