Drawing for CONFERENCENOW!

USPTO serial 75814014

CONFERENCENOW!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONFERENCENOW!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie P. Kramer

LESLIE P KRAMER DORR, CARSON, SLOAN & BIRNEY, PC3010 E 6TH AVEDENVER, CO 80206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for facilitating teleconferencing, for telecommunications gateway applications, namely, audio conferencing via intranets and via a global computer network, for audio and video streaming, data collaboration and database integration, and for interactive voice response applications; teleconferencing systems, namely, operator units, telephone switching equipment, bridges, interfaces, ISDN circuits, ethernet interface cards, power supplies, routers,port management tools, and computer controls-- integrated management and teleconferencing software for conference callsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance