USPTO serial 75814199
8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2900968Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2004
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Halesworth, Suffolk, GB
Halesworth, Suffolk, GB
London, GB
London, GB
Halesworth, Suffolk, GB
London, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlir M. Amado
TERRY W KRAMER KRAMER & AMADO PC1725 DUKE ST STE 240ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Ceramic tokens for use as protection against the effect of geopathic, electric and electro-magnetic fields, microwave radiation and associated resonances to create environmental harmony | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 15, 1998 |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of environmental harmonization, namely the provision of consulting services for the purpose of harmonizing people, their properties and their environments against geopathic, electric and electro-magnetic fields, microwave radiation and associated distorted fields | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 17, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gillett, David R
- Other trademarks owned by Gillett, David R
- Other trademarks owned by Beacon, Jacqueline
- Other trademarks owned by Beacon, Jacqueline
- Other trademarks owned by Gillett, David R
- Other trademarks owned by Beacon, Jacqueline
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named 8
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |